How do you settle a 30-year argument?
Every Experiment runs the same way, whoever we like better going in.
Lock the question first
"Who was the better player?" is a different question from "who had the higher peak?" or "who was the better playoff player?". We write it down before looking at a single stat.
Build the best case for both
Our hunches are just starting points. Each player gets his strongest possible argument before anything is scored.
Ten battles
We split the game into ten battles, from scoring to rim protection. In each one, 100 points get shared. Even is 50–50. A clear edge is something like 55–45.
Demo row, not a real scoreBattleexamplePlayer A 45Player B 55Stress-test it
Peak. Playoffs. Portability. Who lasted. If the answer flips under pressure, we say so.
Call it, or don't
No result is guaranteed. An Experiment can end in any of these:
Player APlayer BDrawUnresolvedDifferent shapesYour call
Every Experiment shows its receipts. Disagree? Bring evidence we missed and we'll look again.
Our host is AI
Our on-screen host, J Swish, is a synthetic, AI-generated presenter, and we label him that way on every video. He presents the Experiment. He doesn't decide the result: the result comes from the evidence above.